Obama Brings Big Government to High School

Many teenage kids regard school as the functional
equivalent of prison—where they are forced to endure oppressive
rules, bad food, and unpleasant company. For them, Barack Obama has
a message: There will be no parole.

In his State of the Union address, the president came out in
favor of warehousing youngsters for longer than ever. We know,
insisted Obama, “that when students aren’t allowed to walk away
from their education, more of them walk the stage to get their
diploma. So tonight, I call on every State to require that all
students stay in high school until they graduate or turn 18.”

Most states now allow students to drop out at 16 or 17. As a
general rule, though, quitting high school restricts your options
and reduces your income. Few adults would advise a youngster to
leave without a diploma.

But general rules don’t apply in all cases. The question here is
not whether most students are better off finishing high school;
it’s whether the kids who otherwise would drop out are better off
being forced to finish high school.

That’s a very different question. Candidates who stay in the
presidential race past April are far more likely to get the
nomination than candidates who give up in January. But Rick Perry
wasn’t going to win even if he had stayed in till Christmas. If
you’re headed in the wrong direction, it doesn’t help to keep
going.

Why Obama floated the idea, with minimal explanation, is an open
question. But the National Education Association, the country’s
biggest teachers union, has been pushing it. If you were cynical,
you might think the union likes the proposal because it would mean
more kids in school, which would mean more jobs for teachers, and
that Obama likes it because the NEA endorsed him.

But even if their motives are pristine, it doesn’t mean they are
sound. The problem is that the youngsters who are most likely to
drop out are the ones who are least likely to learn if they
stay.

If they are 1) struggling to pass, 2) unwilling to apply
themselves, 3) chronically tardy and absent, or 4) simply not very
bright, they won’t learn much from being locked in a cell—I mean a
classroom—for two extra years.

James Heckman, a Nobel laureate economist at the University of
Chicago who specializes in education, is skeptical of the proposal.
At the college level, he told me, “The returns to people who are
not very able or not very motivated are typically quite low.” There
is evidence that kids may get some benefit from being required to
stay in high school until 16 instead of 15, he says, but “it’s a
weak reed to lean on.”

Let’s also not forget that the highest dropout rates are in the
worst schools. Even the kids who want an education often graduate
from these schools barely able to read. Where does Obama get the
idea that the reluctant students, compelled to remain, will reap a
rich harvest of learning?

It might be argued that even if there is no benefit from keeping
these students around till they turn 18, there can’t be any harm.
But think again.

The presence of disruptive, unmotivated kids in a class is a
drain on teachers, a distraction to other students, and a daily
obstacle to learning. One of the best things you can do for
students who want to do the right thing is to remove those who
would rather goof off or make trouble.

It’s not clear that laws like this will even work. A 2010 Johns
Hopkins University study found that when six states raised the
mandatory attendance age, three saw no increase in graduation
rates—and one saw a decline. Coauthor Robert Balfanz praises the
18-year-old mandate, but told The New York Times that
“it’s not the magical thing that in itself will keep kids in
school.”

If you want to keep unwilling students in school, you can spend
money on truancy enforcement, which means taking money away from
the willing students. It would be more rational to use the funds on
education improvements so more kids will choose to stay.

A private company—or a private school—whose customers are
fleeing has to come up with ways to keep them around. In Obama’s
public sector, there is a quicker solution: Lock the exits.

COPYRIGHT 2012 CREATORS.COM